Re: Pacific Plate Movement
Posted by chris in suburbia on December 17, 2001 at 06:57:58:

Lowell's comments on driving forces on plates sounded correct to me. I agree that a lot of what was being said by David T. on Terracycles was not correct (or, maybe since we are supposed to be open-minded on this page-my objection is that much of what he was saying is not plausible but was presented as "facts"...), and am surprised that Roger bothered to spend that much time on that debate. I only bothered to read the first few posts. Concerning convection: I'll check with my geophysicist wife on the latest, but there is probably large scale convection-but Lowell is correct that many think the convection is being dragged by the plate. A poster in the "U" section by Warren Hamilton at AGU may be interesting on this-things like sinking plates causing slab rollback and forcing asthenosphere (less viscous mantle) out of the way. -Chris-back from AGU


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Pacific Plate Movement - bobshannon.org  16:20:49 - 12/17/2001  (12101)  (0)
     ● Re: Pacific Plate Movement - Roger Hunter  10:05:44 - 12/17/2001  (12096)  (1)
        ● Re: Pacific Plate Movement - bobshannon.org  17:48:49 - 12/17/2001  (12102)  (1)
           ● Re: Pacific Plate Movement - Roger Hunter  18:44:57 - 12/17/2001  (12105)  (1)
              ● Re: Pacific Plate Movement - Cathryn  23:24:09 - 12/22/2001  (12198)  (0)
     ● Re: Pacific Plate Movement - Canie  08:04:19 - 12/17/2001  (12095)  (1)
        ● Re: Pacific Plate Movement - Cathryn  23:29:54 - 12/22/2001  (12200)  (1)
           ● Re: Pacific Plate Movement - Canie  16:50:41 - 12/24/2001  (12221)  (0)