Thanks Canie and David,

I don't really expect much support for this theory, it's pretty far removed from the mainstream (laugh).

Consider though, that accepted science takes for a fact that Mercury has remained in it's present orbit around the sun for 4.5 Billion years. It's hard for me to imagine a planet being in that state of tremendous heat for so long without exploding.

Every animate being in nature grows, procreates, and dies. Is it so hard to believe that such an animate being as the sun, or the universe, might share natures tendancy?

Many things have been written about the composition of the planets in our solar system, but the truth is we know relatively little. We don't really even understand our own earths composition, just make suppositions based on drilling samples (which only go down a few miles), and seismic wave data. How can we claim to know so much about the others?

We make assumptions based on two thousand years worth of observations, and less than a hundred years worth of reliable data. Why do we assume that earth has always remained in it's present orbit? Perhaps our gravity wasn't as strong during the dinosaurs reign, allowing them to achieve such tremendous proportions.

4.5 Billion years is a very, very long time, but our planets age is just a guess too based on our assumptions.

You bring up good points regarding the rotational velocities, but I'm not sure that the planets have always rotated at their current pace.

All the best, Billion
http://www.billionwatts.com