Earthquake location determination procedure explained
Posted by EQF on November 29, 2001 at 22:14:10:

Internet Bulletin Boards and Newsgroups provide us with invaluable resources for sharing information in a timely manner. But they can have their limitations. For example, important support information regarding posted notes may be missing. And this might be a good example of that. I did not think that it was necessary to add the following information to my original note. However it apparently was after all.

My earthquake forecasting program involves noting the positions of the sun and the moon and certain ocean tide crests and troughs at the times when significant earthquakes occur. Then when an earthquake precursor such as an "ear tone" is detected those same types of measurements are again made for its detection time. The precursor data are compared with data associated with the past earthquakes. And when a good match is found it indicates to me that another earthquake could be about to occur near where the previous one occurred.

I ran the ear tone time in your first note through that procedure. And the numbers which it generated were a perfect match for that Dominican Republic area earthquake and a fairly good match for the other earthquakes listed in my first note. However, that does not necessarily mean that an earthquake will occur near any of those locations.

The subjects of ear tones and earthquake forecasting are being discussed here. And I thought that site visitors might find that ear tone related location information to be interesting.

This information is my own opinion.