|
|
|
Re: Good call, Petra on the Saratoga Ml 3.3
|
Posted by Cathryn on November 19, 2001 at 06:35:37:
Thanks, Todd. I agree with you that the rupture didn't extend north as far as Saratoga. But (and please correct me if i'm mistaken), I believe the aftershock sequence did include earthquakes that far away. A lot of aftershocks actually seem to travel perpendicular to the fault that saw the rupture (or would that be rapture?), so I'd be interested in your opinion, or anyone else's. Cathryn
|
|
|