Re: Solar/Geomagnetic Data sites for comparison with Shan's data
Posted by Roger Hunter on October 28, 2001 at 13:58:10:

Length of day changes?

You need an atomic clock for that, not a shadow on the wall.

Shan's method has a lot of problems. I really don't think he can measure LOD changes and I seriously doubt the earth's inclination changes the way he thinks. He certainly can't measure anything in the way of vibrations with a once per day marking.

There are a number of more likely causes. Humidity effects on the shadow pole, anything which would move the pole, etc. etc.

The quakes he is associating are typically small ones in active areas. I'll do the probabilities if Lowell is busy. Is there a list of past predictions?

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Solar/Geomagnetic Data sites for comparison with Shan's data - mark  23:16:42 - 10/28/2001  (10453)  (1)
        ● Re: Solar/Geomagnetic Data sites for comparison with Shan's data - R.Shanmugasundaram  07:16:41 - 10/30/2001  (10481)  (0)
     ● Re: Solar/Geomagnetic Data sites for comparison with Shan's data - R.Shanmugasundaram  17:35:31 - 10/28/2001  (10438)  (0)
     ● Re: Solar/Geomagnetic Data sites for comparison with Shan's data - Lowell  15:08:12 - 10/28/2001  (10428)  (1)
        ● Re: Solar/Geomagnetic Data sites for comparison with Shan's data - Roger Hunter  15:14:00 - 10/28/2001  (10429)  (1)
           ● Re: Solar/Geomagnetic Data sites for comparison with Shan's data - Lowell  15:21:37 - 10/28/2001  (10430)  (0)