EQF;

> My data indicate to me that that one might have been one of the relatively low magnitude earthquakes I was expecting. So, that would mean one of two (or three) things:
>
> 1. There is another relatively low magnitude one still approaching plus a fairly high magnitude one.
>
> 2. There is a single high magnitude earthquake that is still approaching.
>
> 3. Or, my observations and theories related to these phenomena still need more refinements.

I vote for #3.

> The original EM Signals were detected on September 17, 2013. And the usual 5 day Time Window for a powerful earthquake to occur would close tomorrow night, the 22nd.

Powerful is too vague. You could claim anything as a hit with that.

> Also as I proposed, 50% of the time the powerful one might not occur for a while. But it should be pretty obvious which one it is if it does occur before tomorrow night.

The only pattern which might make sense is a peak which persists for some time and then ends, followed by a 7.0+ (say) quake within 5 days. The odds on that happening by chance are 0.188 so one hit means nothing.

How many times does such a pattern happen with and without a following quake? Do you know and if not, why not?

Roger