Re: YUNNAN, CHINA 6M Suspect
Posted by EQF on February 21, 2013 at 13:53:50:

Roger,

For at least the 1000th time, you don't have even a tiny clue regarding what is going on here. Don’t you have any pride as a technical person. Why not try to develop some understanding of what is taking place instead of just constantly telling the entire world that you haven’t a clue regarding what is going on.

I wasn't making a prediction. Shan did. I stated that my data were at least consistent with his. And I stated that I was not really expecting anything major at the moment.

If there were no line peaks on my chart at 100E I would have probably said that none of my data support his.


This is something that people attempting to forecast earthquakes need to do. And that is, compare notes. That information wasn’t intended for you.

That data comparison process takes place all the time through E-mail and via Shan’s and my forecast Web sites and other sites. The notes here represent public versions of that data comparison process. They let site visitors see what some of the people involved with forecasting work are doing at the moment.

Again, if you want to participate in this process then why not try to make at least some type of effort to learn what is going on instead of just posting totally senseless criticism notes.

These are personal opinions.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: YUNNAN, CHINA 6M Suspect - Roger Hunter  16:39:02 - 2/21/2013  (100364)  (1)
        ● Re: YUNNAN, CHINA 6M Suspect - Island Chris  07:42:45 - 2/22/2013  (100365)  (1)
           ● Re: YUNNAN, CHINA 6M ; Apologies to all - Roger Hunter  09:29:37 - 2/22/2013  (100366)  (1)
              ● Re: YUNNAN, CHINA 6M ; Apologies to all - EQF  02:28:46 - 2/23/2013  (100367)  (1)
                 ● Re: YUNNAN, CHINA 6M  - Roger Hunter  09:09:39 - 2/23/2013  (100368)  (0)