EQF;

> My opinion regarding the value of various types of forecast data are obviously quite different than yours.

Point in my favor. 8-)

> It is stunning how well Pavel's and my data agree. And that validates both methods.

Not at all, you haven't ruled out coincidence.

> With Shan's method I can't tell directly if it is working or not. So it is important to have a program such as Etdprog.exe that can display all of the data on a single chart so that they can be easily compared.

I can and it doesn't. Display is nice but not conclusive. I have a program to display Amit's windows with quakes and you can see that some hit and others don't. That proves nothing but I have added a statistical test which shows the results are below chance levels.

> Finally, as I said, you might want to give some thought to doing that Etgtab - ocean tide program comparison if and when you have time.

Tide height is strictly location dependent so what looks significant at Rapanui might be negative at San Francisco. It's a dead end.

Also I'll likely be busy moving soon (I hope!)

Roger