Re: 103 degree locations
Posted by Roger Hunter on January 06, 2013 at 22:49:56:

Amit;

> 1)Look at the fact that the date is prone for major quake

It isn't true.

> 2)You did not comment on USGS and mag accuracy

It's subject to change as new information becomes available. That's why evaluation is not done right away.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: 103 degree locations - Amit  11:53:26 - 1/8/2013  (100061)  (1)
        ● Re: 103 degree locations - Roger Hunter  12:33:27 - 1/8/2013  (100062)  (0)