|
Re: 103 degree locations |
Amit; > 1)Look at the fact that the date is prone for major quake It isn't true. > 2)You did not comment on USGS and mag accuracy It's subject to change as new information becomes available. That's why evaluation is not done right away. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: 103 degree locations - Amit 11:53:26 - 1/8/2013 (100061) (1) ● Re: 103 degree locations - Roger Hunter 12:33:27 - 1/8/2013 (100062) (0) |
|