[Roger Hunter]

(07-05-2015, 12:25 PM)Island Chris Wrote: Roger,
Brian is mostly correct. I was just talking in general about the past on this page. I'm not asking for you to do an evaluation now. And, yes, there probably has not been anyone here who has gotten date and magnitude range correct. Instead, hypothetically, let's say someone did have a highly statistically significant record for date and magnitude ranges. In the past, you have posted that this is not useful, because presumably you can't save lives that way.

From my perspective, it would be useful and interesting; I would want to know the method, and it could eventually tell you something about the process of quakes being triggered or cascading from some creep or smaller quakes or whatever.

Chris

Yes, I agree. If someone is getting the date right then something is going on and deserves closer examination. In my evaluation of Amit I look only at date. I use mag 6+ quakes because the smaller ones happen so often any date would be a hit.

Roger