[Roger Hunter]

Duffy;

Quote:Thanks for opening a file for me, at least I've got my name on something more than just my driving licence.

Oh, more than that. You have a whole subdirectory in my computer.

Quote: I'm listening to you and Brian because Chris said you were the guys who knew how best to deal with what I have. I private messaged Brian a couple of weeks ago with concerns of my lack of computer literacy, ( didn't want to spoil the quake thread with different subject) amongst other things, he told me as this was an unusual prediction method, I could dispence with the usual prediction formalities and post images and text instead.

At this stage, yes. The purpose of the form is to get consistent and unchangeable data but that isn't necessary yet.

Quote: Unfortunately, the image refused to go unless I filled in the big red boxes that kept flashing before me. Assuming you have the same prediction table on your screen as I have, where it say's End Date End Date 23/02/2015, to start with, is it normal to have End Date twice, took me 20 minutes to get that date in, because it wouldn't allow more than ten characters, and the end date in the box would not delete.

I don't know. The images are not important to me. All I care about is date/time/mag at this stage. Let's consider this a learning experience until you're more confident. I'll help by evaluating in real time so you can learn what works best.

Quote:Appologies if yours say's different, it's either an on going glitch in the system, or I've done something wrong from my end. Which could also explain why you said the "second quake was to late", my End Date reads as above which I assumed would mean I was 20 hours 7 minutes within my End time, or 19 hours 37 minutes using glitch time.

No I meant the next quake was outside the window.

Quote:I'm sure I mentioned somewhere that location isn't predictable with this method, I can give a 48 hour window, and I'm building up a pattern which gives a rough distance eg. half way round the world or the other side of the world, the former is in radial distance say 10,000km. Magnitude depends on the type of quake, but I'm also building up a pretty good pattern with that. It was only a small disturbance in the image, which I was reluctant to post, were it not for my wife's insistance, but I can imagine how it would have looked if this system had been stationed on a Mexican Beach !!.

Location can come later, if you can consistently give date and mag.

Quote:Under this sites perameteres, I'm not likely to get a hit, would have been nice, but my main reason for being here is to have witnesses on a public forum, to show the potential of what this could be developed into. Chris was right, I think this is more physics than prediction, and though I'll continue posting images in predictions, I think realistically I should be looking to reasearch and development (can't afford to keep this going without an end goal).

We can help with that but you mustn't object if the answer is "wrong".

Roger