Logout 
Portal 
Forum
Search
Members
Help 
02-12-2017, 09:07 PM
Roger;
Power still not stable, I used a different device but it wouldn't let me access new posts ... sorry about that.
It is the latter that applies, the locations are only temporary because signal source identified them as being in the lateral paths of the sun and moon, at the time the signal was detected. If my interpretation of results from independent tests is correct, any connection before the 16th Jan or after 28th Jan is "random". This is why I have been suggesting we do the exact same test again and again, until we have a better idea of its meaning. If we use the results from this test as the standard, and compare further tests against it, we should be able to establish proper odds in the future. You have to remember, I am testing a genuine source as far as I am concerned, but from your point of view I could be picking numbers out of a hat. These locations are random until testing proves otherwise. If future results match or exceed the standard, we can conclude this source has no significance, and this is why I requested you pick the next numbers (due in 2 days!) so the test is not seen to be in my favour. Chance says I put 24 crosses on a map and got the results posted, we are trying to determine if this is always so ... or are my crosses there because they have correlation with earthquakes !
You could still test all quakes between the 16th and 28th Jan (as stated in the table) to see if your results match mine.
Duffy
Power still not stable, I used a different device but it wouldn't let me access new posts ... sorry about that.
It is the latter that applies, the locations are only temporary because signal source identified them as being in the lateral paths of the sun and moon, at the time the signal was detected. If my interpretation of results from independent tests is correct, any connection before the 16th Jan or after 28th Jan is "random". This is why I have been suggesting we do the exact same test again and again, until we have a better idea of its meaning. If we use the results from this test as the standard, and compare further tests against it, we should be able to establish proper odds in the future. You have to remember, I am testing a genuine source as far as I am concerned, but from your point of view I could be picking numbers out of a hat. These locations are random until testing proves otherwise. If future results match or exceed the standard, we can conclude this source has no significance, and this is why I requested you pick the next numbers (due in 2 days!) so the test is not seen to be in my favour. Chance says I put 24 crosses on a map and got the results posted, we are trying to determine if this is always so ... or are my crosses there because they have correlation with earthquakes !
You could still test all quakes between the 16th and 28th Jan (as stated in the table) to see if your results match mine.
Duffy