Logout 
Portal 
Forum
Search
Members
Help 
01-22-2017, 03:28 PM
Events for 22nd Jan
22nd Jan M 7.9 Bougainville Region P.N.G. 155' 06' E - 6' 12' S ............................................................ 04:30:23 ut
Sunrise at Bearing 28' 53' E - 11' 39' N (15th Jan) occurred at ....................................... 04:30 ut 22nd Jan
22nd Jan M 5.6 New Britain Region, P.N.G. 04:44:52 ut ... 153' 33' E - 6' 12' S ...... LS 104' 11' E (10th Jan) ....................
Roger;
Once again ... this has nothing to do with prediction, if there is any prediction value here, it can only be assessed after the experiment is finished. The object of the exercise is to determine why there seems to be a link between the data in the table, that I posted on the 16th, and "real-time" events. You know yourself that a 7.9 occurred in P.N.G. at 04:30 ut ... I know my self, that I calculated a co-ordinate of 28' 53' E by 11' 39' N on the 15th, and posted it with the rest on the 16th. Now, if the quake had gone off 5 minutes sooner or later, it would not be sunrise on my co-ordinate. So in a hypothetical scenario, this would imply that I would have to know the exact time the quake was going to occur, and then choose a random point along the sunrise threshold over South Sudan,and stick a pin in my map. That would sound ridiculous in reality, and that's why this is so intriguing, I work the source and stick a pin in my map, and 7 days later, I end up on the sunrise threshold in Sudan, at the exact time a major quake occurs on the other side of the world! As I have stated, I am not a scientist so I can only assume that my words here are clear enough for a scientist to understand. I don't know science lingo, so I can only apologies if this is not to standard. I am "not" predicting here, I just want any scientist to tell me, if my source of information has correlation with earthquakes.
Another point is, I showed a possible link between the events in Cuba, Italy and the Solomon's ... the link being 156' 12' E. The 7.9 in P.N.G. occurred on 155' 06' E, which calculates as 54 arc minutes west of said bearing. I have another cross on my map at 154' 29' E (source calculated and posted on the 18th), 7.9 occurred 37 arc minutes East of this bearing. A further 5.6 quake occurred 15 minutes later in the New Britain Region at 153' 33' E ... 56 arc minutes from 154' 29' E. If I had known they were there ...would I not have tried to predict them ? the crosses are there because of source, not because an earthquake lies below !
Final point ...
The satellite feed stopped at 20:40 ut 21st Jan ... Centre of the moon was on 160' 33' E at this time. Using my formula, if you move 7.25 degrees fore or west of this bearing, you land on 153' 18' E (15 arc minutes West of 5.6 New Britain). It stopped the same time the night before, in both cases the moon was in the vicinity of 156' 12' E ... interesting !
Duffy
22nd Jan M 7.9 Bougainville Region P.N.G. 155' 06' E - 6' 12' S ............................................................ 04:30:23 ut
Sunrise at Bearing 28' 53' E - 11' 39' N (15th Jan) occurred at ....................................... 04:30 ut 22nd Jan
22nd Jan M 5.6 New Britain Region, P.N.G. 04:44:52 ut ... 153' 33' E - 6' 12' S ...... LS 104' 11' E (10th Jan) ....................
Roger;
Once again ... this has nothing to do with prediction, if there is any prediction value here, it can only be assessed after the experiment is finished. The object of the exercise is to determine why there seems to be a link between the data in the table, that I posted on the 16th, and "real-time" events. You know yourself that a 7.9 occurred in P.N.G. at 04:30 ut ... I know my self, that I calculated a co-ordinate of 28' 53' E by 11' 39' N on the 15th, and posted it with the rest on the 16th. Now, if the quake had gone off 5 minutes sooner or later, it would not be sunrise on my co-ordinate. So in a hypothetical scenario, this would imply that I would have to know the exact time the quake was going to occur, and then choose a random point along the sunrise threshold over South Sudan,and stick a pin in my map. That would sound ridiculous in reality, and that's why this is so intriguing, I work the source and stick a pin in my map, and 7 days later, I end up on the sunrise threshold in Sudan, at the exact time a major quake occurs on the other side of the world! As I have stated, I am not a scientist so I can only assume that my words here are clear enough for a scientist to understand. I don't know science lingo, so I can only apologies if this is not to standard. I am "not" predicting here, I just want any scientist to tell me, if my source of information has correlation with earthquakes.
Another point is, I showed a possible link between the events in Cuba, Italy and the Solomon's ... the link being 156' 12' E. The 7.9 in P.N.G. occurred on 155' 06' E, which calculates as 54 arc minutes west of said bearing. I have another cross on my map at 154' 29' E (source calculated and posted on the 18th), 7.9 occurred 37 arc minutes East of this bearing. A further 5.6 quake occurred 15 minutes later in the New Britain Region at 153' 33' E ... 56 arc minutes from 154' 29' E. If I had known they were there ...would I not have tried to predict them ? the crosses are there because of source, not because an earthquake lies below !
Final point ...
The satellite feed stopped at 20:40 ut 21st Jan ... Centre of the moon was on 160' 33' E at this time. Using my formula, if you move 7.25 degrees fore or west of this bearing, you land on 153' 18' E (15 arc minutes West of 5.6 New Britain). It stopped the same time the night before, in both cases the moon was in the vicinity of 156' 12' E ... interesting !
Duffy