[Roger Hunter]

(01-18-2017, 11:46 PM)Duffy Wrote:

(01-18-2017, 02:57 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote:

(01-18-2017, 12:35 AM)Duffy Wrote:

(01-18-2017, 12:00 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote:

(01-17-2017, 11:17 PM)Duffy Wrote: I have re-posted the table below and included sun / moon latitude. I believe I am granted a certain amount of tolerance here, with respect to my solar / lunar hypothesis. Not sure if this extends to other elements I use to detect anomalies, but I've decided nobody will get the point of this thread unless I include them !.  Again, the object of this, is not to predict earthquakes, but to see if the data in the table has relevance to predicting time.  The source of the data is not of importance unless the experiment shows different. I can say it is not linked to past seismic events or lunar data, but it is questionable.  A 5.9 occurred in Cuba today on 76' 34' W, within 1 degree of the 15th Jan data below ... is that number there by chance ? , coincidence or does it have relevance ?

This experiment is real-time, and takes a lot of effort to keep pace with. It started with a 5.8 in Vanuatu with the centre of the sun on 163' E longitude. I intend to finish on 28th Jan at 01:20 ut, because this is exact time of new moon, and occurs on 163' E longitude.  The abbreviations are the same as before, and dates in brackets refer to the lines of data in the table.

 4th Jan 19:54 ut ... CS 117' 12' W - 22' 38' S ...... CM  40' 19' W - 1' 23' S

 6th Jan 01:41 ut ... CS 156' 12' W - 22' 29' S ...... CM 112' 06' W - 4' 08' N

 6th Jan 08:28 ut ... CS   54' 29' E -  22' 27' S ...... CM 149' 38' E -  5' 22' N

 7th Jan 10:24 ut ... CS   25' 36' E -  22' 19' S ...... CM 134' 20' E -  9' 55' N

10th Jan 15:26 ut ... CS  49' 35' W -  21' 52' S ..... CM 103' 22' E - 18' 34' N

12th Jan 13:14 ut ... CS  16' 23' W -  21' 33' S ..... CM 163' 59' E - 18' 06' N

15th Jan 00:26 ut ... CS 175' 50' E -  21' 07' S ...... CM  28' 53' E -  11' 39' N

15th Jan 17:19 ut ... CS   77' 21' W - 20' 59' S ...... CM 144' 11' E -  9' 04' N

18th Jan 18:54 ut ... CS 100' 51' W - 20' 23' S ...... CM 154' 29' E -  3' 09' S

.................................................................................................................

Today's events 18th Jan

18th Jan M 5.2  Southwest of Africa 02:02:27 ut ... 9' 56' E - 52' 55' S ...... LS 144' 29' E (15th Jan) ............

18th Jan M 5.3 Central Italy 09:25:41 ut ... 13' 15' E - 42' 33' N .................................................................
                                          Transition of night to day, at bearing 77' 21' W - 20' 59' S (15th Jan) occurred
                                           at 09:25 ut on the 18th Jan.

18th Jan M 5.7 Central Italy 10:14:12 ut ... 13' 19' E - 42' 38' N ...... CS 29' 04' E (15th Jan) .......................
                                           Transition of day to night, at bearing 134' 20' E - 9' 55' N (7th Jan) occurred
                                           at 10:15 ut on the 18th Jan

18th Jan M 5.6 Central Italy 10:25:26 ut ... 13' 21' E - 42' 33' N ...... CS 26' 16' E (7th Jan) .........................

18th Jan M 5.0 Aleutian Islands 11:18:17 ut ... 179' 39' W - 51' 31' N ... Centre of Sun 13' 03' E !!

After the 5.6 Italy event, the cycle was broken, but it is possible that it will continue again tomorrow (19th) after the sun has again passed 13' East ... there have been no intervening mag 6 quakes to permanently disrupt the established contacts.

I was surprised to see that Italy had experienced a mad Hour of 5+ quakes today, especially so soon after the 6+ quakes it had in October.  In Sumatra and the Philippines, it is generally accepted, so is this still the Norm in Italy ?.  There is no direct connection to Central Italy in the table above ... but I did find correlation !

Sunrise in Amatrice, Italy for the 17th - 18th Jan, at bearing 13' 19' E - 42' 38' N occurrred at 06:36 ut
Sunrise at bearing 16' 23' W - 21' 33' S (12th Jan) for the 17th - 18th Jan occurred at 06:36 ut

Sunset in Amatrice, Italy for the 17th - 18th Jan, at bearing 13'19' E - 42' 38' N  occurred at 15:59 ut
Sunset at bearing 28' 53' E - 11' 39' N (15th Jan) for the 15th - 18th Jan occurred at 15:59 ut

Transition of day to night, in Amatrice, Italy bearing 13' 19' E - 42' 38' N occurred at 17:42 ut on the 17th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 156' 12' E - 22' 29' S (6th Jan) occurred at 17:42 ut on the 17th Jan

The Jury is still out on this one ... but if I had chosen random days, times and co-ordinates, and posted them 3 days ago ... how could they be so closely connected to a location in Italy, that has just experienced multiple 5's again ?  Does this in any way imply that sunrise / sunset could actually be used to track down impending seismic events ?... I think it does, because this is what I use to determine locations for my predictions. But I also think they can be used to determine time of event, once the right sequence is found.  Unfortunately, this could be a long time in the future, because in both cases, one would first have to accept the possibility that solar / lunar influences may play a part in priming a seismic event.

What happened in Italy today, gives a good indication that another event may occur on the opposite longitude.  My other data indicates a strong signal in the Aleutian Islands at approx 168' 30' W - 53' N. I got a hit near here on the 9th Jan at 169' W, but my prediction indicated there may be two. Once the 9th Jan had occurred, resolution improved showing something still remained at the fore mentioned co-ordinates.  If my assumption is correct, then other clues are to be found in the data table ... the main one being 112' 06' W. The second table I posted, shows 112' W as the prominent bearing. On three occasions the sun lies on 112' W longitude, but each time it does, it is also sunrise on 168' W - 53' N.  Any influence can only be established by reactions in the space data at this time.  If the correlation with Amatrice, Italy is considered significant, then the pieces are here in this data to find the next one, if you find how they link together ... you find the time !

I sourced another line of data today, and have included it in the table ...


Duffy

Duffy;

Here's what I think is happening. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

You see a familiar pattern which determines a longitude for sun and moon at that time.

Next you take a fairly broad band to the quakes for the next month involving sun, moon, and longitudes on the opposite side of the earth.

Any correspondence is taken as a hit but you don't count the rest as misses..

You're misleading yourself.

I think if you plot all this on a map you'll see the size of the net you're casting, raising the odds on a hit.

I'm not currently able to do that but I'm pretty sure it needs to be done.

Roger