One for Roger
#7
(06-24-2016, 01:15 PM)Duffy Wrote: [quote pid='1461' dateline='1466732568']
Progress report;

I took the program which looks at mag 7+ quakes and modified it to look for following quakes within 31 day and +/- 15 degrees of the quake location and 180 degrees away. Results show on average 1/3 success.

I don't know how to figure odds on this but 1/3 success isn't going to impress anyone, particularly with such large areas.

Actually, this could be considered chance expectation so in comparison your actual predictions would have to succeed significantly more to be considered worthwhile.

Roger

[/quote]




Reply


Messages In This Thread
One for Roger - by Duffy - 06-22-2016, 09:46 PM
RE: One for Roger - by Roger Hunter - 06-23-2016, 08:18 PM
RE: One for Roger - by Duffy - 06-23-2016, 11:26 PM
RE: One for Roger - by Roger Hunter - 06-23-2016, 11:57 PM
RE: One for Roger - by Roger Hunter - 06-24-2016, 01:42 AM
RE: One for Roger - by Duffy - 06-24-2016, 01:15 PM
RE: One for Roger - by Roger Hunter - 06-24-2016, 08:05 PM
RE: One for Roger - by Roger Hunter - 06-25-2016, 07:41 PM
RE: One for Roger - by Duffy - 06-30-2016, 02:53 PM
RE: One for Roger - by Duffy - 07-01-2016, 07:55 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)