Logout 
Portal 
Forum
Search
Members
Help 
06-24-2016, 01:15 PM
[quote pid='1461' dateline='1466732568']
[quote pid='1460' dateline='1466726235']
> I don't want to burden you when you're ill but I would like to understand what you're doing.
It's OK Roger, been in the dog house so much lately I believe my wife is buying me a leash.
> You see a pattern on your screen you feel is related to a quake somewhere.
Feel is technically correct as I can't get anyone to confirm this yet, but "know" would be better word !
> You determine the longitude of the sun and moon at the time of the signal and expect a quake to follow at certain related longitudes.
I determine longitude of the " East and West limbs " of the sun and moon at the time of a signal. I cannot emphasise the limbs enough, the centre of the sun and moon do play a part, but only by a small margin compared to the limbs. The last quake I listed was 5.9 Ryukya Islands, check where the longitude of the sun's right limb was at this event time, then check the longitude of the Pacific Antarctic Ridge quake at 03:30 ut ... they are following suit Roger !. Refer to the maps in" Ace on a hole", I had been trying to keep pace with the quakes using this method for several weeks when the link broke after the Luzon Island quake, from my perspective as a non scientist, Luzon was acting like a hub to other events, like a plasma ball at a science fair, energy is attracted to your hand on the glass but the source is in the centre of the globe. This method detected an anomaly at Luzon before it appeared in the satellite data or my own systems, but it is still only a small part of a combination with many factors to consider; orbital position changes, orbital distances, orbital angle relative to anomalies on earth etc. Poses a big question why this actually works, the pattern indicates that for every 5+ quake that occurs, the sun and moon are leaving a longitude footprint in earths magnetic field, but the residual effect only lasts so long, a bit like magnetising a paperclip by rubbing it on a magnet, the magnetism isn't permanent and dissipates after a given time.
> If this is correct I should be able to do the reverse; look up the sun and moon locations at the time of a quake and see if the sun and moon are where they should be. More exactly, see if they were there at some time in the near past
In theory, possibly, but it's the limbs that count mostly, you would end up trying to compensate for lateral diameters .. near past is correct.
> Is this correct? I don't want to do a lot of programming for a false understanding.
Description I have given is correct, but my advice would be to try old school for a week or two with a screen map, ruler and felt pen, use the T&D map if you want to duplicate my method, it is a bit twitchy regarding odd numbers but I think that's a program fault. You would get a better perspective on the parameters required for your program, wouldn't hurt to try a bit of low tec as I do ... see where it leads!.
Duffy
[/quote]
[/quote]
[quote pid='1460' dateline='1466726235']
> I don't want to burden you when you're ill but I would like to understand what you're doing.
It's OK Roger, been in the dog house so much lately I believe my wife is buying me a leash.
> You see a pattern on your screen you feel is related to a quake somewhere.
Feel is technically correct as I can't get anyone to confirm this yet, but "know" would be better word !
> You determine the longitude of the sun and moon at the time of the signal and expect a quake to follow at certain related longitudes.
I determine longitude of the " East and West limbs " of the sun and moon at the time of a signal. I cannot emphasise the limbs enough, the centre of the sun and moon do play a part, but only by a small margin compared to the limbs. The last quake I listed was 5.9 Ryukya Islands, check where the longitude of the sun's right limb was at this event time, then check the longitude of the Pacific Antarctic Ridge quake at 03:30 ut ... they are following suit Roger !. Refer to the maps in" Ace on a hole", I had been trying to keep pace with the quakes using this method for several weeks when the link broke after the Luzon Island quake, from my perspective as a non scientist, Luzon was acting like a hub to other events, like a plasma ball at a science fair, energy is attracted to your hand on the glass but the source is in the centre of the globe. This method detected an anomaly at Luzon before it appeared in the satellite data or my own systems, but it is still only a small part of a combination with many factors to consider; orbital position changes, orbital distances, orbital angle relative to anomalies on earth etc. Poses a big question why this actually works, the pattern indicates that for every 5+ quake that occurs, the sun and moon are leaving a longitude footprint in earths magnetic field, but the residual effect only lasts so long, a bit like magnetising a paperclip by rubbing it on a magnet, the magnetism isn't permanent and dissipates after a given time.
> If this is correct I should be able to do the reverse; look up the sun and moon locations at the time of a quake and see if the sun and moon are where they should be. More exactly, see if they were there at some time in the near past
In theory, possibly, but it's the limbs that count mostly, you would end up trying to compensate for lateral diameters .. near past is correct.
> Is this correct? I don't want to do a lot of programming for a false understanding.
Description I have given is correct, but my advice would be to try old school for a week or two with a screen map, ruler and felt pen, use the T&D map if you want to duplicate my method, it is a bit twitchy regarding odd numbers but I think that's a program fault. You would get a better perspective on the parameters required for your program, wouldn't hurt to try a bit of low tec as I do ... see where it leads!.
Duffy
[/quote]
[/quote]