02-01-2017, 02:27 AM
Roger
My first post was on the 16th, and I stated the experiment had started with a 5.8 in Vanuatu on the day of that post,. And would conclude at new moon on the 28th, the duration actually being 11 days, 1 hour, 19 minutes and 5 seconds. I can see somewhere in this, it was my fault for assuming you understood the purpose of this exercise, and therefore understood why it started on the 16th. I again put my family second for something I thought may be of significance, when in fact you as the evaluator didn't understand it from the start. Don't trouble yourself with programs because I will not be repeating this again, there is too much time and effort involved. Given the surface area of the Earth, compared to a few points on a map, which resulted with indirect correlation with 5+ quakes, in a short period of time, seemed to be worthy of the experiment. I thought the odds against that being possible must be very high ... I was wrong !
Duffy
My first post was on the 16th, and I stated the experiment had started with a 5.8 in Vanuatu on the day of that post,. And would conclude at new moon on the 28th, the duration actually being 11 days, 1 hour, 19 minutes and 5 seconds. I can see somewhere in this, it was my fault for assuming you understood the purpose of this exercise, and therefore understood why it started on the 16th. I again put my family second for something I thought may be of significance, when in fact you as the evaluator didn't understand it from the start. Don't trouble yourself with programs because I will not be repeating this again, there is too much time and effort involved. Given the surface area of the Earth, compared to a few points on a map, which resulted with indirect correlation with 5+ quakes, in a short period of time, seemed to be worthy of the experiment. I thought the odds against that being possible must be very high ... I was wrong !
Duffy