[Roger Hunter]

(06-23-2016, 11:57 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote:

(06-23-2016, 11:26 PM)Duffy Wrote:

(06-23-2016, 08:18 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote: What am I supposed to do with it?

Roger

Sorry Roger,  I realised you didn't understand my equation so on reflection , it was a mistake to send it ... but now it's here, I thought best to add an explanation.    The image represents the effect of the left limb of the sun on 119' W at the time the signal stops.  I recorded two more like it today, 07:00 ut right limb of sun on 82' E  and 11:04 ut right limb of moon on 119'W. 

Its part of a combination, example;

quakes of 5+ today (23rd)

07:44 ut M 5.0 Kermadec Islands  .......... right limb of sun on 70' E at time of event .. and at dark zone distance from epicentre

Next 5+ after Kermadec =  11:35 ut  M 5.4 Hindu Kush at 70' E ... left limb of sun on opposite long to 177' W at time of event

Next 5+ after Hindu kush = 14:55 ut  M 5.2 Kermadec Islands at 177' W ... right limb of sun on 34' W at time of event

Next 5+ after Kermadec = 15:24 ut  M 5.0 Reykjanes Ridge at 34' W ... right limb of sun on opposite longitude to 123' E at time of event

Next 5+ after Reykjanes Ridge = 21:05 ut  M 5.9 Ryukyu Islands at 123' E

If you add enough factors to the equation, you could probably find multiple scenarios to explain a quake event, but when a machine is recording said factors, you follow what the machine is telling you. The image was taken off my P&E monitor, I analysed today's data off said monitor, and this was the result I came up with, it implies correlation.    When i find all the pieces to the combination I am working on, I can complete the equation ... if I can complete the equation, I can get ahead of the machine !!!    Working on the combination, combined with a dodge EM force of unknown origin in my workshop has deteriorated my health, so I seriously have to take a break ... if any worthy anomalies appear on my screens, I'll post a prediction but I can't do the follow up's.   The P&E system always tends to drag its feet as we say here, but it's now running a marathon .. which isn't a good sign !

Duffy

>  I don't want to burden you when you're ill but I would like to understand what you're doing.

> You see a pattern on your screen you feel is related to a quake somewhere.

> You determine the longitude of the sun and moon at the time of the signal and expect a quake to follow at certain related longitudes.

> If this is correct I should be able to do the reverse; look up the sun and moon locations at the time of a quake and see if the sun and moon are where they should be. More exactly, see if they were there at some time in the near past

> Is this correct? I don't want to do a lot of programming for a false understanding.

ADDENDUM:

Of course the sun and/or moon will be in the right location --- every day. I must be missing something.

Roger