This is my first attempt at prediction, and would gladly have given a better image, I was concerned the primary antenna was failing signal reception due to poor recording yesterday. Ironically, I took it off line this morning to replace feed lines, so this recording is from the secondary antenna which isn't disighned to receive Earth bourn EM signals. I decided to post because it has similarities to the image in Radon thread. Earthquake track claiming M6 in Japan at 10:13 UT, no updates from USGS or BGS at the time of posting this. If anything occurs, I will elaborate more on the detail later.
(02-21-2015, 08:09 PM)Duffy Wrote: This is my first attempt at prediction, and would gladly have given a better image, I was concerned the primary antenna was failing signal reception due to poor recording yesterday. Ironically, I took it off line this morning to replace feed lines, so this recording is from the secondary antenna which isn't disighned to receive Earth bourn EM signals. I decided to post because it has similarities to the image in Radon thread. Earthquake track claiming M6 in Japan at 10:13 UT, no updates from USGS or BGS at the time of posting this. If anything occurs, I will elaborate more on the detail later.
Duffy
Duffy, you list two minimum mags. Is that a problem with the data format or did you mean 6 to 7?
(02-21-2015, 08:09 PM)Duffy Wrote: This is my first attempt at prediction, and would gladly have given a better image, I was concerned the primary antenna was failing signal reception due to poor recording yesterday. Ironically, I took it off line this morning to replace feed lines, so this recording is from the secondary antenna which isn't disighned to receive Earth bourn EM signals. I decided to post because it has similarities to the image in Radon thread. Earthquake track claiming M6 in Japan at 10:13 UT, no updates from USGS or BGS at the time of posting this. If anything occurs, I will elaborate more on the detail later.
Duffy
Duffy, you list two minimum mags. Is that a problem with the data format or did you mean 6 to 7?
Roger
WOOOPS!!! That's a mistake on my part in the script. The first one is minimum, the second maximum.
I'll fix it, and it should change on all messages.
(02-21-2015, 08:09 PM)Duffy Wrote: This is my first attempt at prediction, and would gladly have given a better image, I was concerned the primary antenna was failing signal reception due to poor recording yesterday. Ironically, I took it off line this morning to replace feed lines, so this recording is from the secondary antenna which isn't disighned to receive Earth bourn EM signals. I decided to post because it has similarities to the image in Radon thread. Earthquake track claiming M6 in Japan at 10:13 UT, no updates from USGS or BGS at the time of posting this. If anything occurs, I will elaborate more on the detail later.
Duffy
Duffy, you list two minimum mags. Is that a problem with the data format or did you mean 6 to 7?
Roger
WOOOPS!!! That's a mistake on my part in the script. The first one is minimum, the second maximum.
I'll fix it, and it should change on all messages.
Brian
Brian;
On the ball, way to go!
Also I wonder if it means 6.0 to 7.0 or 6.0 to 7.9...
(02-21-2015, 08:09 PM)Duffy Wrote: This is my first attempt at prediction, and would gladly have given a better image, I was concerned the primary antenna was failing signal reception due to poor recording yesterday. Ironically, I took it off line this morning to replace feed lines, so this recording is from the secondary antenna which isn't disighned to receive Earth bourn EM signals. I decided to post because it has similarities to the image in Radon thread. Earthquake track claiming M6 in Japan at 10:13 UT, no updates from USGS or BGS at the time of posting this. If anything occurs, I will elaborate more on the detail later.
Duffy
Duffy, you list two minimum mags. Is that a problem with the data format or did you mean 6 to 7?
Roger
WOOOPS!!! That's a mistake on my part in the script. The first one is minimum, the second maximum.
I'll fix it, and it should change on all messages.
Brian
Brian;
On the ball, way to go!
Also I wonder if it means 6.0 to 7.0 or 6.0 to 7.9...
Roger
Duffy;
This prediction is a hit already; a quake near Honshu Japan at 10:00:58 UTC
This prediction is a hit already; a quake near Honshu Japan at 10:00:58 UTC
That's cutting it a little too close for comfort.
Roger
As Mr. Spock would say.... intriguing.
Brian
Hi Guys;
Not holding much hope for this one, more like a test run, not usually that confident without both systems running. Solar storm started at 10:00 UT, could be this, in my haste I forgot to check OOP's!.
Took me 10 minutes to load image and text, and 40 minutes before prediction table stopped rejecting my imput!, originally typed 10:30 UT for start and finish time (48 hours from when disruption started in image), post reply came out as 10:00 UT on both counts.
The mag 6 to 7 is right, still can't find the 10:00:58 UT quake in Honshu, Japan, only the 10:13:54 on 21st (yesterday), unless it was Roger's washing machine ?.
Main system back online today, done a bit more revamping, might even pickup Roger's washing machine .
Hope prediction table works ok next time, because at the moment as McCoy would say
This prediction is a hit already; a quake near Honshu Japan at 10:00:58 UTC
That's cutting it a little too close for comfort.
Roger
As Mr. Spock would say.... intriguing.
Brian
Hi Guys;
Not holding much hope for this one, more like a test run, not usually that confident without both systems running. Solar storm started at 10:00 UT, could be this, in my haste I forgot to check OOP's!.
Took me 10 minutes to load image and text, and 40 minutes before prediction table stopped rejecting my imput!, originally typed 10:30 UT for start and finish time (48 hours from when disruption started in image), post reply came out as 10:00 UT on both counts.
The mag 6 to 7 is right, still can't find the 10:00:58 UT quake in Honshu, Japan, only the 10:13:54 on 21st (yesterday), unless it was Roger's washing machine ?.
Main system back online today, done a bit more revamping, might even pickup Roger's washing machine .
Hope prediction table works ok next time, because at the moment as McCoy would say
"It's dead Jim"
Duffy;
Not sure weather I got a hit today, but I think I'll hit the bottle instead, thought I'd try a "Tequila" !!!.
This prediction is a hit already; a quake near Honshu Japan at 10:00:58 UTC
That's cutting it a little too close for comfort.
Roger
As Mr. Spock would say.... intriguing.
Brian
Hi Guys;
Not holding much hope for this one, more like a test run, not usually that confident without both systems running. Solar storm started at 10:00 UT, could be this, in my haste I forgot to check OOP's!.
Took me 10 minutes to load image and text, and 40 minutes before prediction table stopped rejecting my imput!, originally typed 10:30 UT for start and finish time (48 hours from when disruption started in image), post reply came out as 10:00 UT on both counts.
The mag 6 to 7 is right, still can't find the 10:00:58 UT quake in Honshu, Japan, only the 10:13:54 on 21st (yesterday), unless it was Roger's washing machine ?.
Main system back online today, done a bit more revamping, might even pickup Roger's washing machine .
Hope prediction table works ok next time, because at the moment as McCoy would say
"It's dead Jim"
Duffy;
Not sure weather I got a hit today, but I think I'll hit the bottle instead, thought I'd try a "Tequila" !!!.
Duffy
H Duffy;
You found the right quake. I was typing from memory, always a mistake with me.
There was another one in Mexico today. No signal on that one?
Logout 
Portal 
Forum
Search
Members
Help 
![[Image: eyebrow-081.jpg]](https://trekkerscrapbook.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/eyebrow-081.jpg)
.