Prediction for Guerrero, Mexico 2/10/18
#1
Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'

Magnitude ...... 6+

Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico

Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct

Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct

Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N 
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area


Duffy




Reply
#2
(10-02-2018, 08:56 PM)Duffy Wrote: Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'

Magnitude ...... 6+

Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico

Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct

Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct

Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N 
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area


Duffy

You're stating location +/- 2 minutes of lat/lon? 

That's a pretty small window.

Roger




Reply
#3
(10-03-2018, 12:40 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 08:56 PM)Duffy Wrote: Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'

Magnitude ...... 6+

Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico

Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct

Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct

Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N 
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area


Duffy

You're stating location +/- 2 minutes of lat/lon? 

That's a pretty small window.

Roger

I'm pretty sure he meant degrees. He used ' instead of °.

BTW, ° can be had by holding <alt> and typing 248 on the ten key pad. Gotta love those ascii codes.

Brian





Signing of Skywise Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
Reply
#4
(10-03-2018, 05:00 AM)Skywise Wrote:
(10-03-2018, 12:40 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 08:56 PM)Duffy Wrote: Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'

Magnitude ...... 6+

Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico

Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct

Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct

Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N 
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area


Duffy

You're stating location +/- 2 minutes of lat/lon? 

That's a pretty small window.

Roger

I'm pretty sure he meant degrees. He used ' instead of °.

BTW, ° can be had by holding <alt> and typing 248 on the ten key pad. Gotta love those ascii codes.

Brian

Yes, it was meant to represent degrees.

Thanks guy's... sorry for the confusion.


Duffy




Reply
#5
(10-03-2018, 11:05 AM)Duffy Wrote:
(10-03-2018, 05:00 AM)Skywise Wrote:
(10-03-2018, 12:40 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 08:56 PM)Duffy Wrote: Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'

Magnitude ...... 6+

Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico

Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct

Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct

Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N 
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area


Duffy

You're stating location +/- 2 minutes of lat/lon? 

That's a pretty small window.

Roger

I'm pretty sure he meant degrees. He used ' instead of °.

BTW, ° can be had by holding <alt> and typing 248 on the ten key pad. Gotta love those ascii codes.

Brian

Yes, it was meant to represent degrees.

Thanks guy's... sorry for the confusion.


Duffy

That was my assumption but I wanted to make sure.

Roger




Reply
#6
(10-03-2018, 03:25 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote:
(10-03-2018, 11:05 AM)Duffy Wrote:
(10-03-2018, 05:00 AM)Skywise Wrote:
(10-03-2018, 12:40 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote:
(10-02-2018, 08:56 PM)Duffy Wrote: Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'

Magnitude ...... 6+

Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico

Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct

Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct

Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N 
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area


Duffy

You're stating location +/- 2 minutes of lat/lon? 

That's a pretty small window.

Roger

I'm pretty sure he meant degrees. He used ' instead of °.

BTW, ° can be had by holding <alt> and typing 248 on the ten key pad. Gotta love those ascii codes.

Brian

Yes, it was meant to represent degrees.

Thanks guy's... sorry for the confusion.


Duffy

That was my assumption but I wanted to make sure.

Roger

No problem, took it as a compliment of your faith in my abilities.... but I now stand corrected  Undecided

Duffy




Reply
#7
That is the first prediction here in a very long time. If there was more interest (and posts) on earth science including earthquakes that have already occurred, I would post more. For instance, the M7.5 left-lateral quake with tsunami (and gravity-driven deformation and liquefaction?), in Indonesia, is interesting.
Chris




Reply
#8
(10-03-2018, 06:33 PM)Island Chris Wrote: That is the first prediction here in a very long time. If there was more interest (and posts) on earth science including earthquakes that have already occurred, I would post more. For instance, the M7.5 left-lateral quake with tsunami (and gravity-driven deformation and liquefaction?), in Indonesia, is interesting.
Chris

Yes and if there were more predictions posted here I would have more evaluations to do.

Win win situation!

Roger




Reply
#9
(10-03-2018, 06:45 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote:
(10-03-2018, 06:33 PM)Island Chris Wrote: That is the first prediction here in a very long time. If there was more interest (and posts) on earth science including earthquakes that have already occurred, I would post more. For instance, the M7.5 left-lateral quake with tsunami (and gravity-driven deformation and liquefaction?), in Indonesia, is interesting.
Chris

Yes and if there were more predictions posted here I would have more evaluations to do.

Win win situation!

Roger

Data Correlation... M 3.9 4km SW of Tres Pinos, CA - 121.359'W - 36.765'N

I included a data correlation location in this prediction as an indicator for conformation or adjustment purposes.   On 2nd October at 12:38 UTC, it was dawn in San Leandro, San Francisco Bay area, and sunrise in Coahuayutla de Jose on the co-ordinates of this prediction. As of 12:38 UTC today (5th Oct), it was dawn in Tres Pinos on the USGS co-ordinates posted above, yet it was still sunrise at this time in Coahuayutla de Jose. This data correlation relates to a parallel terminator threshold connection, and indicates no adjustment is necessary to the prime prediction location (sunrise is holding where it should be... and the dawn threshold is adjusting in relation to the suns southward motion).

Tres Pinos will stay in sync with Coahuayutla de Jose until 8th October.


Duffy




Reply
#10
(10-05-2018, 03:03 PM)Duffy Wrote:
(10-03-2018, 06:45 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote:
(10-03-2018, 06:33 PM)Island Chris Wrote: That is the first prediction here in a very long time. If there was more interest (and posts) on earth science including earthquakes that have already occurred, I would post more. For instance, the M7.5 left-lateral quake with tsunami (and gravity-driven deformation and liquefaction?), in Indonesia, is interesting.
Chris

Yes and if there were more predictions posted here I would have more evaluations to do.

Win win situation!

Roger

Data Correlation... M 3.9 4km SW of Tres Pinos, CA - 121.359'W - 36.765'N

I included a data correlation location in this prediction as an indicator for conformation or adjustment purposes.   On 2nd October at 12:38 UTC, it was dawn in San Leandro, San Francisco Bay area, and sunrise in Coahuayutla de Jose on the co-ordinates of this prediction. As of 12:38 UTC today (5th Oct), it was dawn in Tres Pinos on the USGS co-ordinates posted above, yet it was still sunrise at this time in Coahuayutla de Jose. This data correlation relates to a parallel terminator threshold connection, and indicates no adjustment is necessary to the prime prediction location (sunrise is holding where it should be... and the dawn threshold is adjusting in relation to the suns southward motion).

Tres Pinos will stay in sync with Coahuayutla de Jose until 8th October.


Duffy
Ok but I still don't understand the logic of your method.

Quakes do not happen more often at dawn or sunset so why is the correlation significant?

Roger




Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)