[Duffy]

I have amassed 14 different data sets over the last two days, all pointing to an anomaly in the Arabian Sea, the quake ETA's I have been posting are also connected.

There is no indication of when but it looks close,  all three of my systems are in sync with the same anomaly, when usually they are divided on different aspects, it may be that my antenna's are orientated in that direction so the signal may be greatly enhanced.

This prediction is for the Northern region of the Arabian Sea at bearing 20' N lat by 61' 45' E long ......... a second choice which has been exhibiting influence for a while is South of Guadalupe at bearing 47' 45' N lat by 118' W long ( possibly same longitude contact signal as Sierra Nevada in Sat's prediction ).

I will run these until 00:00 ut  10th July .... magnitude between 5 - 6.5 ... Margin of +/- 3' on both counts, though confidence is still low on latitude.

Thank you 

Duffy

(23:05 ut)

[Duffy]

(06-28-2016, 11:06 PM)Duffy Wrote: I have amassed 14 different data sets over the last two days, all pointing to an anomaly in the Arabian Sea, the quake ETA's I have been posting are also connected.

There is no indication of when but it looks close,  all three of my systems are in sync with the same anomaly, when usually they are divided on different aspects, it may be that my antenna's are orientated in that direction so the signal may be greatly enhanced.

This prediction is for the Northern region of the Arabian Sea at bearing 20' N lat by 61' 45' E long ......... a second choice which has been exhibiting influence for a while is South of Guadalupe at bearing 47' 45' N lat by 118' W long ( possibly same longitude contact signal as Sierra Nevada in Sat's prediction ).

I will run these until 00:00 ut  10th July .... magnitude between 5 - 6.5 ... Margin of +/- 3' on both counts, though confidence is still low on latitude.

Thank you 

Duffy

(23:05 ut)

Just correcting a mistake in this prediction ... latitude for Guadalupe should be 27' 45 North.

A 5.1 occurred yesterday (30th June) on the SouthWest Indian Ridge at 61' E long, it is within the longitude part of the bearing I gave, but the signal is still active on both this and the opposite longitude so another event is still possible. 

Duffy

[Duffy]

(07-01-2016, 07:45 PM)Duffy Wrote:

(06-28-2016, 11:06 PM)Duffy Wrote: I have amassed 14 different data sets over the last two days, all pointing to an anomaly in the Arabian Sea, the quake ETA's I have been posting are also connected.

There is no indication of when but it looks close,  all three of my systems are in sync with the same anomaly, when usually they are divided on different aspects, it may be that my antenna's are orientated in that direction so the signal may be greatly enhanced.

This prediction is for the Northern region of the Arabian Sea at bearing 20' N lat by 61' 45' E long ......... a second choice which has been exhibiting influence for a while is South of Guadalupe at bearing 47' 45' N lat by 118' W long ( possibly same longitude contact signal as Sierra Nevada in Sat's prediction ).

I will run these until 00:00 ut  10th July .... magnitude between 5 - 6.5 ... Margin of +/- 3' on both counts, though confidence is still low on latitude.

Thank you 

Duffy

(23:05 ut)

Just correcting a mistake in this prediction ... latitude for Guadalupe should be 27' 45 North.

A 5.1 occurred yesterday (30th June) on the SouthWest Indian Ridge at 61' E long, it is within the longitude part of the bearing I gave, but the signal is still active on both this and the opposite longitude so another event is still possible. 

Duffy

I am notifying a significant aspect change in all 3 systems at 19:30 ut ( 6th July ), there are strong indications it relates to 118' W long.

There are also indications of a possible event in the central American region, possibly Costa Rica or Panama at approx 81' 30' W long.

If I am reading the morphological change correctly, it suggests an ETA of 03:10 +/- 30 minutes ... but next 48 hours is probably a safer bet.

Duffy

(23:40 ut)

[Duffy]

A new structure appeared this morning at 07:30 ut (7th July), 12 hours after the aspect change ... the structure repeated again at 19:30 ut this evening. The sun was at 62' East long and 118' West long respectively at these times, and 118' West long at 19:30 ut yesterday.

   

I've been wondering if ACE was going to back me up .

Duffy

[Duffy]

(07-07-2016, 09:42 PM)Duffy Wrote: A new structure appeared this morning at 07:30 ut (7th July), 12 hours after the aspect change ... the structure repeated again at 19:30 ut this evening. The sun was at 62' East long and 118' West long respectively at these times, and 118' West long at 19:30 ut yesterday.



I've been wondering if ACE was going to back me up .

Duffy

Yep! I again posted an error ... bearings given were related to sun left limb relative to map.

Another signal has appeared at 20:00 ut, it's the same anomaly as yesterday but shows strength may have reduced, centre of sun is on 118' 40' W long at this time ...

Apologies,

Duffy