Thanks for taking the time to research answers for me .. I was aware of the Carrington event, but not the physical effects on the telegraph systems, I found it most intriguing. The Carrington event is testamony to the Sun's influence on Earthly devises, understandably, this was an exeptional case, but if it was possible to connect to Earth's magnetic field, would it not be plausible to experience similar effects on a smaller scale ?. Solar flares were unheard of before Carrington, so how would one go about trying to establish weather they are detecting, for want of a better word "micro Carringtons" eminating from the Earth. I have been trying to address this by posting about the Maglev .. the following images relate to my post this morning (08:40 ut)
2016-5-15
2016-5-15
The second image is a follow on from the first, again, detail is not required about the traces .. the aspect change in the first image corresponds to the Maglev going off, and both images as a whole correspond with data in the magnetogram stack plots at spaceweatherlive.com, unfortunately, I can't seem to save this one, so I hope you catch this in the next 20 hours .. you did say something may be interfering with it, causing it to destabilise !! There has been related data to my other post on the ACE site, but the screen updates before I press send, so this isn't going to prove anything to anyone. Think I'll post on the Maglev under a different thread, I am certain it will show further corrolations, and it might start getting confusing if I continue posting here!.
A couple of questions Brian, if that's ok; Do you know of any kind of measuring equipment on the open market I could purchase to help determine presence of external magnetic field etc ?, and given the details I have stated, could you suggest any alternate experiments I could try ?.
Thanks for the reassurance on health issues .. as strange as it sounds, I did have under lying concerns, but if my hair starts falling out, we can cover this subject again some time .. nothing worst than hairs on Electronified pizza
Cheers
Duffy
Thought I would add an update to this post as something of interest has appeared in the ACE data ..
This image was taken from timeanddate.com, It depicts the position of Sun / Moon at the time the Maglev went off, and my signal dropped, the center of the Sun is at 49' 6' E longitude .. approx 1 degree off my past Iran prediction.
I have just taken this image off the ACE site, it shows a rapid increase of electrons at 15:56 ut
This time and date image depicts Sun / Moon position at start of increase .. the left limb of the moon (relative to the map) is at 49' E longitude ... Is this coincidence ? ... or is this worth following up ?
At 18:04 ut, a mag 5.1 had occurred in Bougainville Region PNG ... I couldn't help noticing were the left limb of the Moon was at 08:40 ut in the TD image !! .. Is this one a coincidence ?.
The signals on all my systems are now indicating a build up is in progress, maybe next 24 / 48 hours !
(05-15-2016, 03:51 PM)Duffy Wrote: Do you know of any kind of measuring equipment on the open market I could purchase to help determine presence of external magnetic field etc ?
There certainly are. Try a google search on "magnetic field detector". Prices range from cheap to "oh my crikey!" As with anything, you get what you pay for, though. Too cheap and it's junk. Yet you probably don't need a hyper sensitive science quality device that only a science lab can afford.
A word of warning, though. There is a crowd of folks who believe that stray EMF fields are very detrimental to their health. They even think the wiring in their house is making them sick. So be aware that there are websites selling EMF detectors that cater to this crowd. I'd be wary of those sales as the devices may be mis-marketed or deceptive in their advertised abilities. Or outright fake. And probably over priced to boot!
(05-15-2016, 03:51 PM)Duffy Wrote: ... given the details I have stated, could you suggest any alternate experiments I could try ?.
Nothing specific. Try different locations for the maglev toy and the antenna. It'll take time, perhaps weeks, as you need to leave them in their new locations for a while so you can gauge any change in behavior.
I'd suggest picking 3 or 4 locations for each item and trying all the combinations. Note that 4 locations for two devices means 16 different combinations, so that's a lot of experimenting. So maybe three places is enough as that's only 9 combinations.
That way you can make a grid comparing all the results easily. 3x3 is a tic-tac-toe grid. (I think you call it naughts and crosses?)
Thanks for the info Brian, I had a shop round last night and found an EMF detector on Amazon UK, took your advice and gone for a mid-priced unit with an external probe. Not quite sure what I will achieve with this yet, or were best to apply it, but I'm hoping it may show increase/ decrease in relation to time of signal source. Apparently, these kind of devices are used by ghost hunters, I didn't know that .. hope I don't bump into Father-in-law again after all this time .. might want his tools back .
"Good suggestion" to try different locations, I don't want to disturb my present set up, so I've ordered a couple more Maglev's, I'll play about with them for a while and see what happens !.
Whilst on the subject of Maglev's, I decided to include some images related to their disturbance on 12th may at 17:30 ut (posted)
This T&D image shows position of Sun/Moon at said time, this was the instance two Maglev's destabilised, the Sun was in the longitude range of the M6.7 quake in Ecuador that occurred today at 07:57 ut, I'm not implying any correlation yet, but I am speculating the Maglev's are reacting to hot spots, the stronger the signal, the greater the intencity, thus destabilising two units rather than one !. The next double after this was 08:40 ut 15th May (posted), again, no correlation but the Sun was occupying the longitude of my last prediction .. Iran!. I will continue with notifications as I am confident this will "not" turn out to be a fruitless exercise.
The following images were taken off the ACE site, and give an example of satellite disruption experienced on 12th May.
I included these because I search for correlating patterns between my own data and online sources, I am leading a constant battle to keep my systems opperational, and I have stated and demonstrated numerus times that an unknown (Earth) source is causing the disruption ... If the satellite is monitoring the Sun, "what is causing this"?.
I thought the following image warrented a quick up date .. I've had an audible EMF detector running for a week now with no responce .. at 17:50 ut today (28th) it suddenly started going crazy, the needle is going from one side of the guage to the other at a rate of approx three times a second. I placed it 12" from the workshop antenna with a probe hanging vertically .. never had one of these as you know, so does this action signify anything ?.
This image is off system three, I usually get corresponding time data on this one to destabilised Maglev's, it would appear the EMF detector is doing likewise !
If you or anyone else have been following my prediction posts .. this may be an ironic coincidence but at 17:50 ut the Sun was on the opposite longitude to 91' E !! .. an anomaly related to this bearing appeared on my other system yesterday (27th) but nothing became of it, I recorded something similar a couple of days before the Oz quake, but the intencity is much greater in this one. I really don't have enough data at the moment to suggest this is seismic related, but what ever it is, it doesn't look good !
I haven't mentioned the Maglev's because they have not gone off since my last notification post.
I thought the following image warrented a quick up date .. I've had an audible EMF detector running for a week now with no responce .. at 17:50 ut today (28th) it suddenly started going crazy, the needle is going from one side of the guage to the other at a rate of approx three times a second. I placed it 12" from the workshop antenna with a probe hanging vertically .. never had one of these as you know, so does this action signify anything ?.
This image is off system three, I usually get corresponding time data on this one to destabilised Maglev's, it would appear the EMF detector is doing likewise !
If you or anyone else have been following my prediction posts .. this may be an ironic coincidence but at 17:50 ut the Sun was on the opposite longitude to 91' E !! .. an anomaly related to this bearing appeared on my other system yesterday (27th) but nothing became of it, I recorded something similar a couple of days before the Oz quake, but the intencity is much greater in this one. I really don't have enough data at the moment to suggest this is seismic related, but what ever it is, it doesn't look good !
I haven't mentioned the Maglev's because they have not gone off since my last notification post.
Cheers
Duffy
Second thoughts .. just took this image off ACE site, and It has provided confomation to me that this is seismic in nature ... at its peak, the Sun is at 131' W longitude, but 48 hours of my own data is strongly in favour of the opposite at 49' E " Iran" , this location is turning out to be a real nemesis.
I thought the following image warrented a quick up date .. I've had an audible EMF detector running for a week now with no responce .. at 17:50 ut today (28th) it suddenly started going crazy, the needle is going from one side of the guage to the other at a rate of approx three times a second. I placed it 12" from the workshop antenna with a probe hanging vertically .. never had one of these as you know, so does this action signify anything ?.
I have to admit, I'm baffled. Obviously the EMF detector is detecting *something*. What, I don't know. In my limited knowledge I don't know how an unconnected antenna can really do anything, except maybe act as a reflector for already existing EM waves from somewhere else. I don't know how an antenna can change any frequencies to another.
My only thought at the moment is to keep things as they are and see if this pattern continues or was just a one time coincidence.
What range of frequencies is the EMF detector supposed to work on? Or maybe let me know what model you bought and I'll look up its specs.
The unit I bought is a Cellsensor EMF detection meter/Ghost sensor ... it has two scales of 0-5 and 0-50 milli gauss, and cost £35 from Amazon UK. First thing I did was run it continuously to test battery duration, 32 hours on a 9v battery .. , I now only switch it on when I'm present, and I've started logging hours used because it only seems to respond to unknown sources after approx 20 hours use. Sensitivity seems to increase with battery depletion, similar to how my model dinosaur was reacting last November. I don't think it's picking up any EM directly, more likely it is detecting instabilities with the Maglev's ... I have tried it in different places, including close proximity to the obb antenna's, and it doesn't detect anything else except the Maglev's, which seems logical as these use magnetic fields to operate ... every time it responds, the needle is extremely erratic, so I can't determine a precise reading, tests are still ongoing though.
You might want to check the specs on a new item I recently purchased ... it's an Acoustimeter microwave radiation detector, £300 from Amazon UK. I'm still working on the idea this is possibly linked to microwaves, changing focused frequencies within the microwave spectrum may account for the range of appliances being affected, your suggestion the antenna's may be acting like reflectors sounds plausible, the frequency changes are from the sources they are receiving i.e. varying anomalies related to my current predictions perhaps!. I decided to purchase another detector after experiencing a couple of new phenomena earlier this week, the expense seemed to warrant it. On Monday morning, I got into my truck to go to work, started the engine and within 10 seconds the car stereo went into search mode, and chose a different radio station to the one I usually listen to. I spent 10 minutes trying to retune without success, it always landed on the same station. I was running late so decided to deal with it later, started up the road and after approx 100 yds the stereo went into search mode again, I pulled over and this time was able to re-tune to my normal station with no problem. Three hours later I returned, and got within 100 yds of my home again, and "yes" the stereo instantly went into search mode, and ended up on the same horrible opera singing station as before. I spent the next two hours driving up and down the road in front of my house, and kept getting the same results. I know there could be other reasons for this, station changes in tunnels etc, but never heard of this in my locality, and it hasn't happened since. I catalogued this as phenomena due to a given proximity from antenna's ... an aspect change recorded in my data the same day seems to back this up.
Second phenomena occurred the evening of the same day, two of my three monitors were trying to connect to the internet. I removed the broadband receiver from my obb in February, mainly to prevent signal contamination, the hub is in my house 100 yds away, and the receiver relied on line of sight to operate. The only way I could use the internet from my obb was via usb connection, the other catch is the monitors are 6ft below ground level, they have never been on line from new, and I had disabled broadband connection in their options menus. I had approx 2 hours of information windows coming on and off repeatedly " connected to home hub" " connection cancelled" etc. I can only speculate that they were trying to connect usting the antenna's ... is this in any way possible ?, again, this has not occurred since.
Finally ... I have been researching more about the electromagnetic field, and found myself guided to "photons" listed in Wikipedia, I don't pretend to fully understand these articles, but one sentence under "wave-particle duality" caught my attention; " According to our present understanding, the electromagnetic field itself is produced by photons, which in turn result from a local gauge symmetry and the laws of quantum field theory". I may have a miss guided understanding of this, but it led me to an experiment to try and determine a photon influence. I bought several solar powered patio lights, and charged two of them in full sunlight for a day, then covered the solar panels with black electrical tape, thus they instantly activated. I left one in the garden and hung the other next to the workshop antenna, the one in the garden depleted in 10-11 hours, the workshop light lasted for 25-26 hours (repeated this 3 times now with different units), how is this possible ?. Again, I am speculating that some kind of charge is being received from the antenna, but not enough to keep pace with the energy used ... is it possible for solar panels to absorb a limited amount of energy by other means without the need for exposure to light ?, the experiment is ongoing and would appreciate any insights you may have or alternate suggestions.
Sorry if some of this sounds a little weird, I'm just telling it as it is ... and I'm afraid I have to do a lot more speculating than usual, the physicist that was originally helping me has gone AWOL , I know not the reason but it's not bestowing me with confidence in the scientific community again (present company accepted). I'll sign off now .. have to go and explain to the neighbours why I was driving my truck past their window for two hours the other day, before they start thinking I'm crazy ... wish it was that simple here .
(06-05-2016, 05:35 PM)Duffy Wrote: is it possible for solar panels to absorb a limited amount of energy by other means without the need for exposure to light ?, the experiment is ongoing and would appreciate any insights you may have or alternate suggestions.
Certainly possible. Silicon solar cells are sensitive not only to visible light, but also infrared. And many everyday items that appear opaque are translucent if not transparent to infrared. Case in point, the smoked black plastic cover on the tv infrared remote control. In this case it is likely that the black electrical tape is letting in enough infrared to keep a "trickle charge" going on the patio lights. One may be getting more than the other due to their location.
I have had a hunch rolling around in the back of my mind for a while now, and your radio troubles just make me wonder even more. Unfortunately it means asking a question that I don't want you to answer publicly.
Please check for a private message when you log on next.
(06-05-2016, 05:35 PM)Duffy Wrote: is it possible for solar panels to absorb a limited amount of energy by other means without the need for exposure to light ?, the experiment is ongoing and would appreciate any insights you may have or alternate suggestions.
Certainly possible. Silicon solar cells are sensitive not only to visible light, but also infrared. And many everyday items that appear opaque are translucent if not transparent to infrared. Case in point, the smoked black plastic cover on the tv infrared remote control. In this case it is likely that the black electrical tape is letting in enough infrared to keep a "trickle charge" going on the patio lights. One may be getting more than the other due to their location.
I have had a hunch rolling around in the back of my mind for a while now, and your radio troubles just make me wonder even more. Unfortunately it means asking a question that I don't want you to answer publicly.
Please check for a private message when you log on next.
Brian
Sorry Brian, checked several times but nothing new in my inbox, broadband was terrible here last night, could you try a re-send or use my email if you have it.
(06-06-2016, 10:09 AM)Duffy Wrote: Sorry Brian, checked several times but nothing new in my inbox, broadband was terrible here last night, could you try a re-send or use my email if you have it.
I've tried again. I must have clicked a wrong button.
Logout 
Portal 
Forum
Search
Members
Help 
.