[Island Chris]

There was a M6.5 and 6.8 strike-slip quakes near the northern part of Cascadia, but towards the west side of the Juan de Fuca plate or a related small plate). Probably has little effect on the Cascadia subduction zone. I'll have to look late which nodal plane it is to see if it might tweak the subduction zone a tiny bit.

Chris

[Duffy]

(10-22-2018, 02:35 PM)Island Chris Wrote: There was a M6.5 and 6.8 strike-slip quakes near the northern part of Cascadia, but towards the west side of the Juan de Fuca plate or a related small plate). Probably has little effect on the Cascadia subduction zone. I'll have to look late which nodal plane it is to see if it might tweak the subduction zone a tiny bit.

Chris

The following SWPC images depict how the electron flux was behaving, before and during the 6.5+ Port Hardy events.

   

   


Duffy

[Skywise]

The time of the quakes is certainly coincident with the strong activity in the second graph.

The question is, are they related. That's the hard thing to answer.

Brian

[Duffy]

(10-23-2018, 03:29 AM)Skywise Wrote: The time of the quakes is certainly coincident with the strong activity in the second graph.

The question is, are they related. That's the hard thing to answer.

Brian

Yes, I would have to agree. The data leaves the question open to speculation, and without a definitive correlation to the actual event location, it can only be regarded as coincidental.


Duffy

[Roger Hunter]

(10-23-2018, 02:37 PM)Duffy Wrote:

(10-23-2018, 03:29 AM)Skywise Wrote: The time of the quakes is certainly coincident with the strong activity in the second graph.

The question is, are they related. That's the hard thing to answer.

Brian

Yes, I would have to agree. The data leaves the question open to speculation, and without a definitive correlation to the actual event location, it can only be regarded as coincidental.


Duffy

Duffy;

So far no hits on your prediction list.

Roger

[Duffy]

(11-21-2018, 11:11 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote:

(10-23-2018, 02:37 PM)Duffy Wrote:

(10-23-2018, 03:29 AM)Skywise Wrote: The time of the quakes is certainly coincident with the strong activity in the second graph.

The question is, are they related. That's the hard thing to answer.

Brian

Yes, I would have to agree. The data leaves the question open to speculation, and without a definitive correlation to the actual event location, it can only be regarded as coincidental.


Duffy

Duffy;

So far no hits on your prediction list.

Roger

True... can't seem to get a grip on this during solar minimum. 

Are you still going to be doing this in 6.5 years ?  

Why are we in Earth Sciences ?


Duffy

[Duffy]

(11-22-2018, 12:48 AM)Duffy Wrote:

(11-21-2018, 11:11 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote:

(10-23-2018, 02:37 PM)Duffy Wrote:

(10-23-2018, 03:29 AM)Skywise Wrote: The time of the quakes is certainly coincident with the strong activity in the second graph.

The question is, are they related. That's the hard thing to answer.

Brian

Yes, I would have to agree. The data leaves the question open to speculation, and without a definitive correlation to the actual event location, it can only be regarded as coincidental.


Duffy

Duffy;

So far no hits on your prediction list.

Roger

True... can't seem to get a grip on this during solar minimum. 

Are you still going to be doing this in 6.5 years ?  

Why are we in Earth Sciences ?


Duffy

Sorry for the negativity Roger... you are just doing your job !

Happy Thanksgiving


Duffy

[Roger Hunter]

(11-22-2018, 01:22 PM)Duffy Wrote:

(11-22-2018, 12:48 AM)Duffy Wrote:

(11-21-2018, 11:11 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote:

(10-23-2018, 02:37 PM)Duffy Wrote:

(10-23-2018, 03:29 AM)Skywise Wrote: The time of the quakes is certainly coincident with the strong activity in the second graph.

The question is, are they related. That's the hard thing to answer.

Brian

Yes, I would have to agree. The data leaves the question open to speculation, and without a definitive correlation to the actual event location, it can only be regarded as coincidental.


Duffy

Duffy;

So far no hits on your prediction list.

Roger

True... can't seem to get a grip on this during solar minimum. 

Are you still going to be doing this in 6.5 years ?  

Why are we in Earth Sciences ?


Duffy

Sorry for the negativity Roger... you are just doing your job !

Happy Thanksgiving


Duffy

No worries Duffy but it's not a job, it's a hobby and no I won't be doing it in 6.5 years.

I'm 84 now so in a few more years I'll be feeding the worms.

Roger

[Roger Hunter]

(10-22-2018, 02:35 PM)Island Chris Wrote: There was a M6.5 and 6.8 strike-slip quakes near the northern part of Cascadia, but towards the west side of the Juan de Fuca plate or a related small plate). Probably has little effect on the Cascadia subduction zone. I'll have to look late which nodal plane it is to see if it might tweak the subduction zone a tiny bit.

Chris

Hi Chris! Long time no see!

Roger

[Island Chris]

Roger Hunter


Hi Roger,

My post about Cascadia is from 2018. I made a post under Miscellaneous a couple of weeks ago. I'll try to post once in a while but because of Covid-19 I'm probably getting 3 times as much email traffic and I'm checking out how friends and family are doing.

Chris