[KathyKeegan]

Now both of them are thinking of dong something, at least up to 3.0s or so.

[Skywise]

(05-10-2015, 05:14 PM)KathyKeegan Wrote: Now both of them are thinking of dong something, at least up to 3.0s or so.

Which map are you using. USGS doesn't show anything. But they're only complete globally down to M4.5 unless significant.

Brian

[KathyKeegan]

(05-11-2015, 02:29 AM)Skywise Wrote:

(05-10-2015, 05:14 PM)KathyKeegan Wrote: Now both of them are thinking of dong something, at least up to 3.0s or so.

Which map are you using. USGS doesn't show anything. But they're only complete globally down to M4.5 unless significant.

Brian

http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/

[KathyKeegan]

(05-11-2015, 02:53 AM)KathyKeegan Wrote:

(05-11-2015, 02:29 AM)Skywise Wrote:

(05-10-2015, 05:14 PM)KathyKeegan Wrote: Now both of them are thinking of dong something, at least up to 3.0s or so.

Which map are you using. USGS doesn't show anything. But they're only complete globally down to M4.5 unless significant.

Brian

http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/

This one can help, too.

http://volcano.si.edu/reports_weekly.cfm

[Skywise]

(05-11-2015, 02:57 AM)KathyKeegan Wrote:

(05-11-2015, 02:53 AM)KathyKeegan Wrote:

(05-11-2015, 02:29 AM)Skywise Wrote:

(05-10-2015, 05:14 PM)KathyKeegan Wrote: Now both of them are thinking of dong something, at least up to 3.0s or so.

Which map are you using. USGS doesn't show anything. But they're only complete globally down to M4.5 unless significant.

Brian

http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/

This one can help, too.

http://volcano.si.edu/reports_weekly.cfm

According to the map at:

http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/section/sei...l-context/

The area is not unusual for quake activity.

Brian

added: thanks for the links