+- Earthwaves Earth Sciences Forum (http://www.earthwaves.org/forum)
+-- Forum: Earthwaves (http://www.earthwaves.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Forum: Earthquake Predictions (http://www.earthwaves.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: Prediction ( J45 ) 10 / 11 / 2016 (/showthread.php?tid=565)
Prediction ( J45 ) 10 / 11 / 2016 - Duffy - 11-10-2016
Prediction (J45)
Longitude .......... 129' 45' W
Latitude ............. 52' 40' N
Error ................. +/- 2'
Magnitude ......... 5.5 - 6.5
Location ............ Queen Charlotte Sound, Canada
Start Date .......... 16:30 ut 10th Nov
Expiry Date ........ 00:00 ut 10th Dec
Duffy
RE: Prediction ( J45 ) 10 / 11 / 2016 - Duffy - 11-30-2016
(11-10-2016, 04:30 PM)Duffy Wrote: Prediction (J45)
Longitude .......... 129' 45' W
Latitude ............. 52' 40' N
Error ................. +/- 2'
Magnitude ......... 5.5 - 6.5
Location ............ Queen Charlotte Sound, Canada
Start Date .......... 16:30 ut 10th Nov
Expiry Date ........ 00:00 ut 10th Dec
Duffy
Update ... I thought I would adjust the longitude on this prediction to 130' 20' W
Why I should do this is a little confusing. Without resorting to reasons that (after recent conclusions) no longer exist, and alternatives may be deemed dis-respectful, I have no answer !
A 5.4 occurred yesterday on the Owen Fracture Zone, bearing 53' 47' E. My hypothesis claims an opposite reaction may occur, and this prediction location is where I believe it will happen. Unfortunately, if an event does occur here, it will only be regarded as a shotgun pellet. The hypothesis may show " potential " that a piece of the seismic puzzle may have been found, but the puzzle is only as good as the person who is fitting the pieces together ! so this is a no win scenario.
I have tried to combat loony mooners, law of averages and analogies to show this works. I recently spent horrendously long nights working on latitude, to show I could throw a dart and actually hit the bull " Because I had aimed for it ! ". I don't know much about shotguns, but it seems that if I hit the target here, I loose anyway !
To claim I accept the conclusion given to my efforts, expense and sacrifice ... would truly be an understatement !
I hope this one doesn't go off ... because I will be coming for my moneys worth if it does !!
Happy Hols
Duffy
RE: Prediction ( J45 ) 10 / 11 / 2016 - Duffy - 12-08-2016
(11-30-2016, 12:50 AM)Duffy Wrote:(11-10-2016, 04:30 PM)Duffy Wrote: Prediction (J45)
Longitude .......... 129' 45' W
Latitude ............. 52' 40' N
Error ................. +/- 2'
Magnitude ......... 5.5 - 6.5
Location ............ Queen Charlotte Sound, Canada
Start Date .......... 16:30 ut 10th Nov
Expiry Date ........ 00:00 ut 10th Dec
Duffy
Update ... I thought I would adjust the longitude on this prediction to 130' 20' W
Why I should do this is a little confusing. Without resorting to reasons that (after recent conclusions) no longer exist, and alternatives may be deemed dis-respectful, I have no answer !
A 5.4 occurred yesterday on the Owen Fracture Zone, bearing 53' 47' E. My hypothesis claims an opposite reaction may occur, and this prediction location is where I believe it will happen. Unfortunately, if an event does occur here, it will only be regarded as a shotgun pellet. The hypothesis may show " potential " that a piece of the seismic puzzle may have been found, but the puzzle is only as good as the person who is fitting the pieces together ! so this is a no win scenario.
I have tried to combat loony mooners, law of averages and analogies to show this works. I recently spent horrendously long nights working on latitude, to show I could throw a dart and actually hit the bull " Because I had aimed for it ! ". I don't know much about shotguns, but it seems that if I hit the target here, I loose anyway !
To claim I accept the conclusion given to my efforts, expense and sacrifice ... would truly be an understatement !
I hope this one doesn't go off ... because I will be coming for my moneys worth if it does !!
Happy Hols
Duffy
Anybody know the opposite to 53' 47' E ? .... won't be claiming my moneys worth this time Roger ! looks like signal refraction again, and there's no satellite cover over CA anymore.
No spreadsheets, all I have is posted here.
Duffy (16:26 ut 8th Dec)